Insurers proposals for young drivers

Thursday 4th October, 2012 at 14:10 COMMENTS (3)

The Association of British Insurers says drivers aged 17-24 are responsible for a disproportionately high number of crashes, deaths and claims insurers and are now calling for an overhaul of the system. 

The ABI said all the evidence showed that newly passed young drivers were the riskiest on the road and that special care was needed to avoid them having accidents. 

It said an 18-year-old was more than three times as likely as a 48-year-old to be involved in a crash, and that a third of drivers killed in car accidents were under 25.  That was despite the fact that the under 25s form only one in eight of all car drivers. 

Yet, somewhat contradictory, the ABI are suggesting reforms including allowing youngsters the opportunity to start learning to drive at just 16. 

If learning to drive was added to the school curriculum, it would go a long way towards aiding their road safety awareness, but is any government ever likely to introduce such a scheme. 

Currently, it seems the education system is very similar to the driver training profession in that it is results centred. 
If driving instructors delivered a structured training programme prior to practical training sessions a solid foundation of knowledge and attitude would have already been laid. 

It's also suggested people should spend at least a year learning to drive which is typical in many American states. 

To drive in Florida legally, you'll be required to have a learner's license for a year, during which you must get at least 50 hours of driving experience, with 10 of those hours being at night. 

Setting a minimum amount of training would encourage learning more freely without the pressures of passing in the shortest possible time. 

'Intensive Driving Courses' or 'Crash Course' as they are sometimes called is also targeted by the ABI. 

Learner drivers see intensive courses as a solution to getting through a driving test quickly, and avoiding some of the difficulties that hourly driving lessons can have. 

The Insurers recognise the negative consequences of a condensed course of learning.  Intensive courses by their very nature restrict the opportunities necessary to build a thorough comprehension of driving scenarios; indeed the impact for learners means the opportunity to master the basic understanding that supports safe driving is minimised. 

Other recommendations would be very difficult to police and may not be entirely practical such as limiting the times youngsters can drive. 

Among the reforms insurers want to see are:

  • A ban on learners being able to take an intensive driving course as their only method of passing
  • But young drivers would be able to start learning earlier, at the age of 16 and a half
  • The introduction of a new "graduated" licence for the first six months after passing a test
  • During this time the number of young passengers that a newly-qualified driver could carry would be restricted
  • They would also be banned from driving between 11:00pm and 4:00am for the first six months, unless they were driving to and from work or college
  • There would be no blood alcohol allowed during those first six months

Our views
Whilst some of these proposals have merit, perhaps we should be looking to get people safer before they get on the road, rather than restricting them afterwards, because a lot of these proposals are very difficult to police. 

Statistics may highlight the consequences of young drivers but these figures should not distract from the need to educate all drivers regardless of experience or age. 

A middle aged driver doesn't automatically become a safe responsible driver just because they have held a driving licence for many years. 

If we are considering a list of recommendations, perhaps we should add, re testing or a graduated level of vehicles to drive, similar to motor bikes. 

Insurance companies should implement blackboxes for all drivers to monitor whether the car is staying within the speed limits, possibly with an opt-out option with an increased premium?

What do you think about the ABI recommendations, are they practical and could they be implemented successfully?

Make a booking

Relevant topics:
New drivers could pay less for car insurance
Have drivers adapted to new car technologies
Keywords: Learner drivers, car insurance, intensive driving, courses, driving, driving lessons, driving, test, drivers, licence, school curriculum, car drivers, karens school of motoring


simon rayner
simon rayner
Friday 22nd September, 2017 @ 5:35 am
in response to the insurers proposals I would agree with certain issues,
intensive or "crash" courses are by name and nature a bad idea, either the pupil becomes overloaded with information too quickly and learns nothing. so wasting their time and money or they manage to retain just enough to pass a test but will have no long term memory of the more subtle nuances of safe driving.

Alcohol - why do the government keep reducing the limit by "half a pint" every year, just say ZERO, end of story. we all know alcohol and driving do not mix, it's easier to say "no thanks" than "oh just a half for me thanks"

start lessons earlier at 16 - a fine idea and should include lessons in school/college where a qualified instructor has 30 pupils in a classroom and can teach safe driving theory, also most have playgrounds which can be used for practical driving tuition. i am sure driving schools will be more than willing to provide instructors and vehicles for this.

night time driving restrictions - virtually impossible to police this. as an aside i think ALL pupils should be made to take a minimum number of lessons at dusk and in the dark, surely all experienced drivers recognise there are many differences between daylight and night driving and can agree that this would benefit learners.

As a motorcycle rider I was affected by the horsepower restrictions placed upon novice riders, With all the modern tech available to car manufacturers these days is it not possible to introduce an equivalent system to that of motorcycles. the system could be made to restrict a cars power relevant to the driver by using a coded system, mum and dad have full power but when young "johnny" borrows the car he only has half the cars capacity, an accident at 30 MPH is less likely to be fatal than one at 60 MPH.

Unfortunately a driving instructor can, realistically, only HOPE to influence a young drivers attitude until they pass the test, after that they are free from that nurturing, likewise speed limits on roads can only really HOPE to discourage excessive speeds, maybe by mechanically restricting the speed available to a new driver we can make them learn to walk before trying to run.......
driving lessons Evesham
driving lessons Evesham
Friday 22nd September, 2017 @ 5:35 am
It's so sad to think that most of the drivers who are prone to roads accidents are these young drivers. However we cannot just say that these are careless and irresponsible driving because we cannot deny the fact that these are only new drivers. Just saying my opinion.
Friday 22nd September, 2017 @ 5:35 am
No alcohol would be a welcome improvement to these laws. It would cut down on accidents, and as a side-effect it might also help reduce our binge drinking epidemic. Also drug driving needs stronger enforcement.

Post a comment

  Please provide valid email address.
Email addresses are never displayed. HTML is not permitted. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically generated. Off-topic or inappropriate comments will be edited or deleted. Email addresses will never be published but may be added to our mailing list.

Name: (required)

E-Mail: (required, never displayed)

optional : Will be hidden ready for approval



Receive email when someone replies.
Subscribe to this blog by email.


To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security text shown in the image.



Karens School of Motoring Blog covers all aspects of learning to drive. Subscribe now to be kept informed!

Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook